Reviewer Feedback

Publish with PLOS
Research Communities
Open Science
Resources
About PLOS

Search:

Menu

When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.

Journals

PLOS Biology
PLOS Climate
PLOS Complex Systems
PLOS Computational Biology
PLOS Digital Health
PLOS Genetics
PLOS Global Public Health
PLOS Medicine
PLOS Mental Health
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
PLOS ONE
PLOS Pathogens
PLOS Sustainability and Transformation
PLOS Water

More Content

PLOS Blogs
PLOS Collections

Peer Review Experience
Thank you for agreeing to provide PLOS with feedback on your experience as a peer reviewer with our journals. Please complete the questionnaire below.
About how long have you been working in your field of research?
- 0-5 years
- 6-10 years
- 11-15 years
- 16-20 years
- 21 years or more
About how many manuscripts do you review in an average year for any journal?
- 0-5 manuscripts
- 6-10 manuscripts
- 11-15 manuscripts
- 16-20 manuscripts
- 21+ manuscripts
Which of the following subject areas best matches your expertise:
How would you rate the experience of peer reviewing for PLOS overall?
- Very satisfied
- Satisfied
- Neutral
- Dissatisfied
- Very Dissatisfied
- Can't Recall
What might have improved your reviewer experience at PLOS?
What did you most enjoy about your peer review experience at PLOS?
When reviewing for PLOS, how helpful were the reviewer guidelines on our website?
- Very Helpful
- Helpful
- Neutral
- Not Very Helpful
- Not At All Helpful
- Can't Recall/Did not consult
Visit the PLOS reviewer guidelines.
What would have made the reviewer guidelines more helpful?
When reviewing for PLOS, how useful did you find the reviewer form in Editorial Manager?
- Very Useful
- Somewhat Useful
- Neutral
- Not Very Useful
- Not At All Useful
- Can't Recall/Did not consult
What would have made the reviewer form in Editorial Manager more useful?
When reviewing for PLOS, did you consult with the PLOS Peer Review Center?
- Yes
- No
- Can't Recall
What is the most challenging aspect of peer review for you?
- Getting invited to review too often
- Getting invited to review the wrong types of papers
- Finding the time in my schedule to complete a review
- Peer review deadlines that are too short
- Understanding different journals’ peer review requirements
- Working with peer review systems
- Something else
Please explain.
Would you like to be updated on PLOS news (for example: recent publications, new article types, Calls for Papers, and Open Science options?)
- Yes
- No
Name
First Last
Email

Δ

PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, and is based in San Francisco, California, US

Home
Resources
Research Communities
Open Science
Publish with PLOS
About PLOS
Research Integrity and Publication Ethics
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion
Press and Media
Contact
Pay Invoice
Careers
Advertise
Financial Overview
Governance
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
Terms of Use
Payment Terms and Conditions
Text & Data Mining
Terms of Service

News & Updates

Email address

PLOS will use your email address to provide news and updates. You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in our emails or by contacting us at privacy@plos.org.

All fields are required, please check your entry and try again.

Back to top

Peer Review Experience